Legal Opinion

Terry v. Williamson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 25, 1923No. 6940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

'The assignments of error set out in the brief of plaintiffs in error contain no reference “to that portion of the motion for new trial in which the erroi? is complained of,” as required by rule 25 for Courts of Civil Appeals (142 S. W. xii), and under the authorities we would be warranted in refusing to consider the assignments presented. , ,

The statement of the nature and result of the suit set out at the beginning of the brief of plaintiffs in error is followed by nine propositions of law, but none of these propositions is accompanied by reference to the .particular assignments of error to…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Afflerbach v. Yorktown Independent School Dist.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  2. Fort Worth & R. G. Ry. Co. v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Anders v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Travelers Ins. Co. v. StilesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Travelers Ins. Co. v. StilesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API