Legal Opinion
Water Replenishment District v. City of Cerritos
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 30, 2013No. B242080PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MALLANO, P. J.
A trial court in a related action made an interim order that the provisions of article XIII D of the California Constitution invalidated a replenishment assessment (assessment) imposed on the City of Cerritos (City) by the Water Replenishment District of Southern California (District), and thus the City was “entitled to mandamus relief commanding the [District] to vacate the [assessment] imposed by [the District] over the past four years.” (City of Cerritos v. Water Replenishment Dist. of Southern California (Super. Ct. L.A. County, No. BS128136) (Proposition 218…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Cheatham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Butt v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- IT Corp. v. County of ImperialCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Agnew v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Green Valley Landowners Ass'n v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- California State University, Fresno Ass'n v. County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Reid v. City of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Berjikian v. Franchise Tax Board CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Coziahr v. Otay Wat. Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2024
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.