Legal Opinion

Romania v. Lamport & Holt, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The issue as to whether or not a general release was executed by. plaintiff in this action for personal injuries involves an examination of the extent of such injury. The plaintiff’s claim is that he was so affected physically and mentally by the injury that he was not a voluntary party to the alleged general release. Under such circumstances two-trials involving substantially the same facts would result. For the foregoing reasons we think we should not interfere with the discretion of the Special Term refusing a separate trial of the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fulmer v. SovocoolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  2. Spencer v. HuntAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  3. Rabin v. Brooklyn Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1947
  4. House v. SchefflerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  5. In re the Estate of AlbrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API