Legal Opinion
Curiale v. DR Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 23, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Diane A. Lebedeff, J.
In these two cases involving reinsurance policies, motions for summary judgment seek a determination regarding the parties’ rights under reinsurance arrangements made through the Society of Lloyd’s of London (Lloyd’s). In each case, the court must decide whether the defendant’s predecessor was a "fronter” for a reinsurance syndicate, which would render defendant wholly responsible for the payment of the claims in the same manner as if it were the sole reinsurer and, if defendant is wholly responsible, whether the reinsurance arrangements are void and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Slater v. Mexican National RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Mertz v. MertzNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Curiale v. DR InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Curiale v. DR InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995