Budkiewicz v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.

Concurring Opinion

Arterburn, J.

I concur in the majority opinion, and do not construe it as making a railroad liable every time it stops a line of freight cars across a highway. The allegations in the complaint in this case are different in some respects from those in the cases of: C. C. C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Gillespie (1930), 96 Ind. App. 535, 173 N. E. 708; New York Central R. R. Co. v. Casey (1938), 214 Ind. 464, 14 N. E. 2d 714; New York Central Railroad Co. v. Gardner (1940), 107 Ind. App. 366, 24 N. E. 2d 811; N. Y. Central R. R. Co. v. Dyer, Admr. (1938), 214 Ind. 708, 14 N. E. 2d 718.

I…