Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Jeremy

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 11, 1896No. Appeal, No. 191PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 191, Oct. T., 1896, by Theodore R. Jeremy, from decree of O. C. Allegheny Co., Nov. T., 1894, No. 82, dismissing exceptions to adjudication. Exceptions to adjudication. The facts appear by the opinion of the lower court which was as follows: By holographic will Mr. Jeremy provided inter alia as follows : “ Third.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 191, Oct. T., 1896, by Theodore R. Jeremy, from decree of O. C. Allegheny Co., Nov. T., 1894, No. 82, dismissing exceptions to adjudication. Exceptions to adjudication. The facts appear by the opinion of the lower court which was as follows: By holographic will Mr. Jeremy provided inter alia as follows : “ Third. I give, devise and bequeath all the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, both real and personal, to my beloved wife líate Jeremy for and during her natural life. “ Fourth. After the death of my wife Kate Jeremy the estate to be held in trust for my two nieces, Bessie…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

We find no error in this record. For reasons given at length by the learned president of the court below, he was clearly right in holding that there was no intestacy, and that distribution must be made accordingly. The decree is affirmed on his opinion, and the appeal is dismissed at appellant’s costs.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cope EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Bosworth's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Friedheim's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Gerhard EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API