Legal Opinion

State v. Sostre

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1996No. 94-0778-CRPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonald W. Steinmetz, J.

The issue in this case is whether a live-in boyfriend, who is a volunteer caretaker of a child, is a "person ... responsible for the welfare of [a] child," and thereby subject to the penalty enhancer found in Wis. Stat. § 948.03(5) (1993-94). We hold that a live-in boyfriend can be a "person . . . responsible for the welfare of [a] child," if he was used by the legal guardian of the child as a caretaker for the child. In such situations, it is appropriate for the penalty enhancer found in Wis. Stat. § 948.03(5) to be applied.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. On November 10, 1991,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Parker v. SullivanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Ynocencio v. FeskoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. EvansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. SampleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  2. McNeil v. HansenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State Ex Rel. Jacobus v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Estate of Genrich v. OHIC Ins. Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. EesleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API