Legal Opinion

Roozen v. Clonin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, James E. Clonin, as assignee for the "benefit of creditors of Herman Dreyer, from a- judgment of the ' County Court of Queens county in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Queens on the 2d day of April, 1896, upon the verdict of a jury upon an appeal by the defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff rendered in a court of a justice of the peace.

1Opinion of the Court

Hatch, J.:

This action is brought to recover the purchase price of a quantity of flower bulbs delivered to one Herman Dreyer. The proof upon the trial tended to establish that Dreyer was engaged in business as a florist near Woodside, in Long Island City, where he had growing plants and numerous articles of personal property used about the business. He also had a farm and green houses at Newtown, in the county of Queens. Prior to July 11, 1894, the sheriff levied upon plaintiff’s property at Woodside to satisfy an execution issued upon a judgment against Dreyer, and on January eleventh this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schmittler v. . SimonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Merritt v. . SeamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  3. Clark v. . HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Fitzgerald v. TiffanyThe Superior Court of New York City · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Standard Audit Co. v. RobothamAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909
  2. In re the General Assignment for Benefit of Creditors of Bert Lansman & Sons, Inc., New York County Courts1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API