Legal Opinion

Livingston v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1968No. 3 Div. 258Published

1Opinion of the Court

CATES, Judge.

Livingston appeals from a judgment of conviction based on a general verdict of guilt. The indictment was in two counts: one for statutory burglary, second degree; the other for grand larceny. 1

The Legislature has prescribed the same statutory range of maximum and minimum punishment for both these crimes. Code 1940, T. 14, § 86 (burglary, second), and § 331, as amended (grand larceny). Hence, since the court pronounced but one sentence of three years in the penitentiary, no question is presented under Lawson v. State, 33 Ala.App. 333, 33 So.2d 405, and Wildman v. State, 42…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Curley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  4. Earl E. Vick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  5. Remmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API