Legal Opinion
Williams v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided December 9, 1957No. 18343Published
1Opinion of the Court
319 P.2d 1078 (1957)
Lee WILLIAMS and The Industrial Commission of Colorado, Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY and Ormand R. West, Defendants in Error.
No. 18343.
Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc.
December 9, 1957.
Rehearing Denied January 27, 1958.
Duke W. Dunbar, Atty. Gen., Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Atty. Gen., Peter L. Dye, Asst. Atty. Gen., for plaintiffs in error.
Bannister, Weller & Friedrich, William H. Hazlitt, Denver, for defendants in error.
MOORE, Chief Justice.
This action is here by writ of error, to review a judgment of the district court of the City and County of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Matter of Carroll v. . Knickerbocker Ice Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Comstock v. BivensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Matter of Altschuller v. BresslerNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Olson-Hall v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
- Armour & Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.