DeWolfe v. French
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Reported from Nisi Prius, Barrows, J., presiding. This was an action of assumpsit on account annexed.
1Opinion of the Court
The facts in the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court, which was drawn up by
Walton, J.
This is an action of assumpsit, in which the plaintiffs claim to recover for two items charged as commissions, for obtaining freight for the defendant’s vessel. The defendant has offered to be defaulted for one of the items, and resists the other, upon the ground that the plaintiffs’ right to recover for it was contingent; that it was expressly agreed that the plaintiffs should wait for their pay till the vessel for which the freight was obtained returned *421with a cargo ; and that the…
2Cited by25 opinions
- North American Graphite Corp. v. AllanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Noland v. BullOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Uniroyal, Inc. v. HellerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Mascioni v. I. B. Miller, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Banque Russo-Asiatique v. DolchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.