Legal Opinion
Griffith v. White
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided June 25, 1996No. 2:95-cv-00217PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SESSIONS, District Judge.
This personal injury action is brought in this Court based on diversity of citizenship. Plaintiff Holly Griffith (“Griffith”) was a passenger in a car owned and operated by Defendant Steve E. White (“White”) when a one car motor vehicle accident occurred in the Province of Quebec, Canada, on April 17, 1994. The matter before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Defendant asserts that the Quebec Automobile Insurance Act, a no-fault law, applies to the Plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- O'Connor v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Miller v. WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. RosenbergerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Sinnott v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. HollandMassachusetts Superior Court · 1997
- Northwest Pipe Co. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.