Legal Opinion

Harrelle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 7, 1992No. 92-0769Published

1Per curiam

Appellant contends that his sentence as a habitual felony offender pursuant to section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1991), should be reversed.

We reject appellant’s contention that the trial court failed to make proper findings pursuant to section 775.084(l)(a)2, Florida Statutes (1991). We agree, however, that the trial court failed to make the findings required by subsections 775.084(l)(a)3 and 4, Florida Statutes (1991), that would establish his prior convictions had not been pardoned or set aside. See Wilson v. State, 605 So.2d 141 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Crosby v. State, 17 F.L.W. 2038, 1992…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Rolle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Van Bryant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  5. Crosby v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API