Harrelle v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Appellant contends that his sentence as a habitual felony offender pursuant to section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1991), should be reversed.
We reject appellant’s contention that the trial court failed to make proper findings pursuant to section 775.084(l)(a)2, Florida Statutes (1991). We agree, however, that the trial court failed to make the findings required by subsections 775.084(l)(a)3 and 4, Florida Statutes (1991), that would establish his prior convictions had not been pardoned or set aside. See Wilson v. State, 605 So.2d 141 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Crosby v. State, 17 F.L.W. 2038, 1992…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Rolle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Van Bryant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Crosby v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992