Legal Opinion
Gimbel Bros. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 6, 1941No. 72PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
This case comes before the court upon the petition of Gimbel Brothers, Inc., which asks us to review and set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commissioner directing the petitioner to cease and desist from using the word “wool” or “woolens” or any other - word or term descriptive of wool to designate any product not composed wholly of wool; with a proviso that goods composed in part of wool may be so advertised if the percentage of each con stituent material is stated. The facts upon which the order is based are not seriously in dispute.
The petitioner conducts a retail…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Federal Trade Commission v. Algoma Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Federal Trade Commission v. GratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Federal Trade Commission v. KlesnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Federal Trade Commission v. Winsted Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Fayne v. VincentTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sterling Drug, Inc., Dancer-Fitzgerald-Sample, Inc., and Thompson-Koch CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Federal Trade Commission v. Cinderella Career and Finishing Schools, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Evening Sentinel v. National Organization for WomenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Brown v. Hecht Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.