Legal Opinion

Bivins v. Guardianship of Bivins

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 10, 2017No. 4D16-234Published

1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.

The appellant raises two issues for our review. The first issue is whether a trial court must enforce a settlement agreement concerning the assets of an incompetent ward where the guardian retained some assets to pay guardianship expenses, contrary to the express language of the settlement agreement. The second issue is whether, upon the death of a ward, a guardian may retain part of a deceased ward’s assets to pay for present and future guardianship expenses. .As to the first issue, we conclude that Florida law favors the enforcement of settlement agreements, and the court erred in failing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford v. PuigDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Sumner Group, Inc. v. MC DISTRIBUTECDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. Treasure Coast, Inc. v. Ludlum Const. Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  4. Romano v. OlshenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  5. Batzle v. BarasoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API