Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Tant

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 9, 1972No. 27499PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Justice.

1. The first question for decision is whether the trial court erred in denying the Cannons’ motion for summary judgment. This motion was based upon the fact they hold the only lawful judgments and are the only claimants entitled to proceed against the insurer under the terms of the policy of liability insurance.

A consideration of the following statutory and case law is necessary for a determination of the merits of this contention.

"Liens of all judgments obtained in actions for damages growing out of a common disaster or occurrence shall be equal in rank or priority,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coney v. HorneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  2. Herrington v. TolbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Carter v. PennSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  4. Salter v. AshburnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  5. Baker v. ShephardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Deller v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  2. Allstate Insurance v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  3. White v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Turtle Creek National Bank v. GretzDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API