Legal Opinion

Laird v. Horn

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 5, 2001No. CIV. A. 99-2311PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUBOIS, District Judge.

MEMORANDUM

I. INTRODUCTION.67

II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY.68

in. APPLICATION OF 28 U.S.C. § 2254.'. 05 CO

A. The Exhaustion Requirement of § 2254 and Procedural Default.... 05 CO

1. Exhaustion. 05 tO

2. Procedural Default. "“5 O

B. Automatic Exhaustion Under the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s Mandatory Appellate Review. i — ( I>

C. Independent and Adequate Procedural Grounds. CO I>

1. Introduction. CO

2. The Pennsylvania “Relaxed Waiver” Rule. ^

3. “Previously Litigated”. L3

D. Application of § 2254 . <0 I>

TV DTRrTTTRSTON i

Guilt Phase Claims. !>

1. Jury and Prosecutorial Irregularities .

a.…

2Cases cited150 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986

145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LairdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Porter v. HornDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. LairdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. State v. AddisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  5. Kimber Edwards v. Donald RoperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API