Legal Opinion

Petrack v. Mlakar

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1966No. Appeals, Nos. 9, 10 and 11PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice O’Brien,. Dorothy Hanolt and Dorothy Petrack suffered perr sonal injuries when an automobile being operated by Dorothy Hanolt’s husband, Robert Hanolt, in which both women were passengers, was struck from the rear on Perrysville Avenue, in the City of Pittsburgh, at approximately 4:00 A.M. on Saturday, December 15, 1962. Mr. and Mrs. Hanolt brought an action of trespass, for recovery of their damages against the operator of the other vehicle involved, George Mlakar, as- did- Dorothy Petrack, seeking the recovery of her damages.In the Petrack case, Robert Hanolt was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Murphy v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beyrand v. KELLYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Beyrand v. KELLYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Cadora v. Novak, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2005
  4. Duke v. Kepner, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1981
  5. Glass v. Schreckengost, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API