Legal Opinion

Emond v. Robison

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 14, 1925No. 6 Div. 304PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

This appeal is prosecuted by the appellant W. B. Emond, from a decree against him in favor of the appellee B. C. Robison, awarding specific performance of a contract for the sale of certain real estate described in the bill. The contract of sale was verbal, but complainant was placed in possession by respondent, and paid a portion of the purchase money, thus taking the case out of the influence of the statute of frauds, and rendering the contract specifically enforceable in a court of equity. Penney v. Norton, 202 Ala. 690, 81 So. 666; Penney v. Lyle, 205 Ala. 476, 88 So. 580.

Complainant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zirkle v. BallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Forrester v. GranberrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Penney v. NortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  4. Davis v. Folmar.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  5. Sherman v. ShermanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wirtz v. GordonMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Eddleman v. CadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Salter v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API