Emond v. Robison
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
This appeal is prosecuted by the appellant W. B. Emond, from a decree against him in favor of the appellee B. C. Robison, awarding specific performance of a contract for the sale of certain real estate described in the bill. The contract of sale was verbal, but complainant was placed in possession by respondent, and paid a portion of the purchase money, thus taking the case out of the influence of the statute of frauds, and rendering the contract specifically enforceable in a court of equity. Penney v. Norton, 202 Ala. 690, 81 So. 666; Penney v. Lyle, 205 Ala. 476, 88 So. 580.
Complainant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zirkle v. BallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Forrester v. GranberrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Penney v. NortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Davis v. Folmar.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Sherman v. ShermanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wirtz v. GordonMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
- Eddleman v. CadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Salter v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952