Legal Opinion

Isaacs v. Baldwin

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by one Isaacs against one Baldwin. Complaint dismissed. Order affirmed, 100 N. Y. Supp. 1122.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Gorman, J.

A court .of equity will not permit the mortgagee or his assignee to take an unconscionable advantage of the mortgagor, who is willing and able to' pay the interest at the prescribed time, but without fault on his qwn part is unable to find the mortgagee, although he makes every reasonable effort to do so. In such a case there can be no valid election to declare the principal due. Schieck v. Donohue, 92 App. Div. 330, 87 N. Y. Supp. 206. In that case the court said:

“If the holder of the mortgage intended to take advantage of the neglect of the mortgagor to pay the interest, it was his duty, as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schieck v. DonohueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Strange v. RosenbergNew York Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API