Legal Opinion

A. Randall Harris v. State of Mississippi

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 2017No. 2015-CA-01193-SCTPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAXWELL, JUSTICE,

FOR THE COURT:

¶ 1. On the morning of his client’s trial, defense attorney Randall Harris tried to withdraw as counsel. When the judge declined his request, Harris told the judge he was “wrong” for doing so, and he “was not going to participate” in the trial. Harris’s refusal to abide by the court’s order forced a continuance. And the judge held him in direct criminal contempt.

¶2. “Direct criminal contempt includes words or actions before the court that tend to embarrass the court or prevent the orderly administration of justice.” 1 We find Harris’s actions clearly fell within…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cole v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Davis v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In Re WilliamsonMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Gale v. ThomasMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Hardy v. BrockMississippi Supreme Court · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Glen Joseph Davis v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
  2. Justin Peterson v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2018
  3. Adofo Minka v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  4. In Re: Kimberly Monique RossCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2026
  5. In Re: M. Zachary JexMississippi Supreme Court · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API