Legal Opinion

Muhtar v. Aetna Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 2, 1984No. 83-2815PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The Muhtars, the plaintiffs below, appeal a final order of dismissal imposed as a sanction for failure to comply with a discovery order. We reverse.

The Muhtars sued Aetna Insurance Company (Aetna) when it refused to pay a claim for damage to goods which Aetna had insured for transit from Panama to Miami.

Aetna propounded a set of interrogatories which was lengthy and detailed.1 After three attempts to comply with such a burdensome request, including a translation of Spanish documents into English, the court dismissed the Muhtars’ suit.

As we have noted in many prior decisions, dismissal is to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Santuoso v. McGrath & Associates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. SUMMIT CHASE COND. ASSOC., INC. v. Protean Investors, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. BEAVER CRANE SERV. v. National Surety Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beauchamp v. CollinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Kleinschmidt v. GATOR OFFICE SUPPLY AND FURNITURE, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Barreto v. GriffinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API