Muhtar v. Aetna Insurance Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The Muhtars, the plaintiffs below, appeal a final order of dismissal imposed as a sanction for failure to comply with a discovery order. We reverse.
The Muhtars sued Aetna Insurance Company (Aetna) when it refused to pay a claim for damage to goods which Aetna had insured for transit from Panama to Miami.
Aetna propounded a set of interrogatories which was lengthy and detailed.1 After three attempts to comply with such a burdensome request, including a translation of Spanish documents into English, the court dismissed the Muhtars’ suit.
As we have noted in many prior decisions, dismissal is to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Santuoso v. McGrath & Associates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- SUMMIT CHASE COND. ASSOC., INC. v. Protean Investors, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- BEAVER CRANE SERV. v. National Surety Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beauchamp v. CollinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Kleinschmidt v. GATOR OFFICE SUPPLY AND FURNITURE, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Barreto v. GriffinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992