In re Ostrowske
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Trexler, J.,
Judgment for $400 based upon a verdict recovered in a case of trespass for false arrest and imprisonment was entered against the defendant. A capias ad satisfaciendum was issued and thereupon the defendant presented his petition for discharge under the insolvent laws. This was refused. He then presented his petition for a rehearing and this being granted and the hearing being had the court found that the defendant was with*313out means and property with which to pay the judgment and that he had not secreted or assigned his property to avoid the payment and accordingly…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Miller's PetitionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Matz v. HaugSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Young's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- De Turk v. GackenbachSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Kubit v. WittSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.