Legal Opinion

Pufahl v. Tamak Gas Products Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 11, 1965No. 5-3390PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sam Robinson, Associate Justice.

Paul R. 'Pufahl, age 22 and unmarried, lived with his parents, Mr. & Mrs. Carl H. Pufahl, at West Memphis. He worked for appellee, Tamak Gas Products Company. On September 12, 1962 he was accidentally killed while working in the due course of his employment.

Appellants here, Mr. & Mrs. Carl Pufahl, father and mother of the deceased, filed a claim with the Workmen’s Compensation Commission contending that they and a daughter were partially dependent on their son for support, and were, therefore, entitled to compensation as provided by Ark. Stats. Ann. § 81-1315…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nolen v. Wortz Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  2. Duke v. Pekin Wood Products Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  3. Crossett Lumber Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  4. Kimpel v. Garland Anthony Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  5. West v. Lake Lawrence Pulpwood Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barksdale Lumber Co. v. McAnallySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Kelley v. Southern Pulpwood Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  3. Williams v. Cypress Creek DrainageCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Pilot Oil Corp. v. SellersTennessee Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API