Legal Opinion

Danolds v. Lord

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1894Published

Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by Henry S. Danolds against James H. Lord. From a judgment in favor of defendant, entered in Monroe county, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDwight, P. J.

This was an action to recover what was alleged to be due to the plaintiff for his share of the profits of a business undertaken and carried on for a little over two months, under the following agreement:

“Agreement made this 26th day of May, 1891, by and between James H. Lord and Henry S. Danolds, as follows: The parties hereto are tó carry on the business of painting roofs under the name of Flour City Roofing Company, of which said James H. Lord shall be sole proprietor and owner. Bach of the parties hereto agree to give their whole time and attention to said business.' Books of account shall…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Emery v. . WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API