Legal Opinion

Zuilkowski v. Sentry Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 21, 1985PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a declaratory judgment action to determine insurance coverage, defendants Sentry Insurance, a Mutual Company, and Royal Insurance Co. of America separately appeal, as limited by their briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Stark, J.), dated December 14, 1984, as denied their motions for summary judgment.

Order modified, on the law, by granting defendant Royal Insurance Co. of America’s motion for summary judgment, and it is declared that Royal Insurance Co. of America is not required to defend or indemnify defendants Hope with respect to an automobile…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. S. J. Capelin Associates, Inc. v. Globe Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Phillips v. Joseph Kantor & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Cohen v. Herbal Concepts, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. YeglinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. Cohen v. Herbal Concepts, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Moffett v. GerardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Merriman v. Integrated Building Controls, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Yi v. JNJ Supply Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Guzman v. Strab Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. DeLisa v. PettinatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API