Legal Opinion

Bambace v. Bachrach

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1959Published

1Opinion of the CourtBenjamin Brenner, J.

In this action the plaintiffs vendees' seek to compel specific performance of an asserted agreement for the sale of a house to them. Defendant vendor moves to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that ‘ ‘ the contract # * * is unenforcible under the provisions of the statute of frauds ” and subdivision 7 of rule 107 of the Buies of Civil Practice.

The memorandum relied on by plaintiffs, and signed by the defendant, reads as follows:

“ Sep 9 — 1959

Beceived $100 dep on parcel 6013-6017 — 13th Ave as agreed price $22,000 subject to contract.”

Defendant contends that the failure of the writing to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mentz v. . NewwitterNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Irvmor Corp. v. RodewaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Pelletreau v. BrennanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  4. Lerand Corporation v. MeltzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Slavit Furniture Co. v. EisenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API