Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bristol v. Walbridge

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 1897PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Certiorari. Removal “for cause,” in legal intendment, means upon sufficient charges, notice thereof, and hearing. State ex rel. v. Walbridge, 62 Mo. App. 164. See, also, People ex rel. v. Commissioners, 72 N. Y. 449; State v. Jersey City, 1 Dutch.

Read the full summary

Certiorari. Removal “for cause,” in legal intendment, means upon sufficient charges, notice thereof, and hearing. State ex rel. v. Walbridge, 62 Mo. App. 164. See, also, People ex rel. v. Commissioners, 72 N. Y. 449; State v. Jersey City, 1 Dutch. (N. J.) 536; Coke in Baggs case, 6 Coke Rep., part 2, 93 (quoted 11 Coke 93); Regina v. Lane, Eortescue, 273; Clark’s case, 2 Orooke, 506; Regina v. Treasury, 10 Ad. & E. 374. Merely one infraction of duty, not being in itself evidential of grossly improper behavior, will not justify amotion from public office. Rex v. Wells, 4 Burroughs, 1999, 2004.…

1Opinion of the CourtBland, P. J.

On February 9, 1897, the relator, Isaac S. Bristol, was the superintendent of the house of refuge in the city of St. Louis. On that day there was filed before Cyrus P. Walbridge, the mayor of said city, the following charges and specifications against the relator:

“ Charge.
“I.
“willful violation and neg-leot of official duty.

“Specification I. In this, that you, Isaac S. Bristol, superintendent of the house of refuge, heretofore *659duly appointed such by the mayor of the city of St. Louis under the provisions of section 2, of article 4, of the charter of the city of St. Louis, which house of refuge…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Munday v. Board of Fire CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Sweet v. MaupinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  3. State ex rel. Lemon v. Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. Elfrank ex rel. Elfrank v. SeilerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  5. State ex rel. Reider v. Moniteau County CourtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Heimburger v. WellsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. State ex rel. Barker v. WurdemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  3. State ex rel. Kansas & Texas Coal Railway v. SheltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  4. Wichita Council No. 120 v. Security Benefit Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. State ex rel. Mount Mora Cemetery Ass'n v. CaseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API