Legal Opinion

Miller v. Lancaster

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1868PublishedCited by 4 opinions

FROM MADISON. At the -, Term, 1867, on the demurrer of respondents, complainants’ bill was dismissed. From the action of the Court, complainants appealed. Chancellor John L. Williamson, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtHenRY G. Smith, J.

This is a bill in equity dismissed by the Chancellor on demurrer.

*516The following are the facts material to the decision made in the case:

On the 7th day of August, 1854, Samuel Lancaster and others, executed their writing obligatory to the Mississippi Central & Tennessee Railroad Company, whereby they bound themselves to pay all damages that might arise from the location of the depot of the company in the west end of the town of Jackson.

The railroad company located and established their depot at the place designated. in the bond, and, by virtue of the authority given by the- charter,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bank of United States v. GlickmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  2. Insurance Co. of North America v. LongTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Hollingsworth, Inc. v. Ruth E. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  4. W. H. McElwain Co. v. PrimaveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API