Legal Opinion
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 12, 1989No. 88 CIV. 4486 (DNE)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
This order arises out of the implementation of the March 14, 1989 Consent Decree between the plaintiffs United States of America (the “Government”) and the defendants International Brotherhood of Teamsters (the “IBT”). The Consent Decree sought to rid the IBT of the hideous influence of organized crime by altering the IBT Constitution to allow meaningful electoral reform and providing for three Court-appointed officers (the “Court Officers”) to oversee the electoral scheme and bring charges against IBT members accused of corruption.
On November 22,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Vuitton Et Fils S. A. v. Carousel Handbags, and Solomon Mizrahi, Joseph Mizrahi, and Maurice Mizrahi, Additional DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- In Re Grand Jury Witness Chanie WeissCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- New York State National Organization for Women v. TerryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Afl-Cio, Appeal of Daniel LigurotisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.