Legal Opinion

State v. Chapman

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 12, 2002No. 00-442PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.

Defendant was charged with driving while intoxicated, and a civil suspension proceeding was held pursuant to 23 V.S.A. § 1205. He appeals the denial of his motion to suppress all statements and evidence in his civil suspension proceeding, arguing that he was subjected to a de facto arrest without probable cause in violation of the United States and Vermont Constitutions. In' the alternative, he argues that the stop and detention were done without reasonable and articulable suspicion of wrongdoing, also in violation of his constitutional rights. We agree and reverse.

The following facts are…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Posr v. DohertyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Ruben PereaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. SpragueSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  2. State v. SimoneauSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  3. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  4. State v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  5. State v. PittsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API