Legal Opinion
Qureshi v. Indian River Transport
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 12, 2019No. 3:18-cv-00027Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON ANJUM Q. QURESHI, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 3:18-cv-27 vs. INDIAN RIVER TRANSPORT, et al., Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Consent Case) Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) APPROVING THE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL REGARDING THE CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFF ANNA QURESHI (DOC. 30); (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF ANJUM QURESHI (DOC. 29); (3) DIRECTING THE…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The Aro Corporation v. Allied Witan CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Ray A. Scharer and Company, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Plabell Rubber Products, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Bowater North America Corp. v. Murray Machinery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Tocci v. Antioch UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- Guy v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.