Legal Opinion

Passarino v. City of Merced

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 31, 1957No. Civ. No. 9124Published

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.

The city of Merced appeals from a judgment against it and in favor of respondent, John Passarino, in an action to recover damages suffered by reason of the flooding and consequent destruction of tomato plants. Passarino appeals from a judgment in favor of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a corporation, the city’s codefendant. The case is factually quite similar, save as to the amount of damage suffered, to the case of Gonella v. City of Merced et al.) this day decided (ante, p. 44 [314 P.2d 124]).

It is unnecessary to restate the facts heretofore stated in the Gonella case.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gonella v. City of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API