Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Kartus

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 21, 1935No. 3 Div. 767Published

1DissentBricken, Presiding Judge

The validity of schedule 51, § 361, Gen. Acts 1919, pp. 282, 395, 411, having been ascertained and determined by the Supreme Court, the only question for decision now is whether or not appellee, in this case, comes within the terms of the statute, supra, under the agreed statement of facts upon which the case was tried in the court below. The trial judge, the Honorable Walter B. Jones, of the circuit court of Montgomery county, held that he did not, and in this I think the trial judge was correct, as it is my opinion, under said agreed statement of facts, it clearly ap pears that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Braxton v. City of SelmaAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Carruth v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Karthaus v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. R. E. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API