Legal Opinion

United States v. Dale Aldridge

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 5, 2017No. 17-1997Unpublished

1Per curiam

Dale Aldridge appeals from the order of the District Court 1 denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Following de novo review, we agree with the District Court that Al-dridge was ineligible for the requested sentence reduction based on an amendment to the United States Sentencing Guidelines because his original sentence was derived from the applicable statutory minimum. See United States v. Moore, 734 F.3d 836, 837-38 (8th Cir. 2013). We decline to address Aldridge’s additional pro se arguments, which are raised for the first time on appeal and are unrelated…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Craig MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API