Wilburn v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Nee Circuit Court. Grant Green, Jr., Judge. The lease to Davis, and the lease back to Wilburn did not create any lien on appellant’s crop. 7 Ark. 253 ; 31 id. 597 ; 33 id. 387. Derrick was an innocent purchaser for value without notice of any lien, if there was one.
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
i. variance between indictment and The defendant appealed from a convic- . tion of false pretenses. The indictment charged him with feloniously and falsely pretending to W. T. Derrick “that he, the said W. C. Wilburn, was then and there the legal owner of a certain growing crop of cotton and corn then situate on the land of him the said W. C. Wilburn,” and did then and there execute a deed of conveyance of the said crop to W. T. Derrick, as security for the sum of one hundred and eighty-five dollars in value of money and property to be thereafter furnished to said Wilburn by said Derrick. And…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Houpt v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Clemons v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- Maxey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Bagnell Tie & Timber Co. v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- Value v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.