Hubbell v. City of Xenia
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentPfeifer, J.
{¶ 28} The majority today reverses a well-reasoned and influential opinion from the Second District Court of Appeals. Other appellate districts have embraced the Second District’s reasoning in this case, rejecting their own former interpretation of R.C. 2744.02(C) as allowing an interlocutory appeal when a trial court has denied a political subdivision’s motion for summary judgment based *83upon the existence of a genuine issue of material fact. The lower court’s opinion in this case deserves that respect — it is true to R.C. 2744.02(C), fair to all parties, and presents the best way to achieve…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Automobile Mutual Insurance v. Titanium Metals Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
- Martin v. City of Gahanna, 06ap-1175 (5-31-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Hubbell v. City of XeniaOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Fogle v. Bentleyville, 88375 (6-14-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007