Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Bihn
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided March 23, 1939PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.
In this accounting proceeding the administratrix c. t. a. moves to strike out the objections to the account filed by her son upon the ground that he is no longer interested in the estate but had previously assigned, by formal instrument, his complete interest in it to his grandmother.
The father of the infant, the decedent, whose estate is involved here, died in 1929. In his will he bequeathed his entire estate to his widow. By reason of the birth of the son, who is the objectant here, subsequent to the date of the execution of the will, the latter became entitled as the sole child to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fairbanks v. . SargentNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Hyland v. . BaxterNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Allen v. . La VaudNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- In Re the Estate of StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Leask v. HoaglandNew York Supreme Court · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lorisa Capital Corp. v. GalloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- In re the Accounting of BergmannNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
- In re the Estate of DevlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re the Estate of KasnerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
- In re PolinskyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.