Barfield v. F. W. Woolworth Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
In a District Court the judge found for the plaintiff on a count for personal injury to the plaintiff resulting from eating an apple dumpling purchased from the defendant at its restaurant, which apple dumpling the defendant warranted to be fit for human consumption but which was unfit therefor. A physician who attended the plaintiff testified that she was suffering from food poisoning, caused by eating something within three hours before she became ill about half past two on the afternoon of October 3, 1950. She had eaten the apple dumpling shortly after half past twelve that afternoon. A…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Epstein v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Friend v. Childs Dining Hall Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Schuler v. Union News Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Payne v. R. H. White Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Flynn v. Growers Outlet, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Hoch v. Venture Enterprises, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1979
- Denaro v. 99 Restaurant, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
- Cooper v. Lasso Drive-In, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1957
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.