Legal Opinion
Eutectic Corp. v. Metco, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 18, 1980No. 80 C 268PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEAHER, District Judge.
This is an action by an adjudged patent infringer to set aside a judgment of patent validity alleged to have been obtained by a fraud committed on the court, and to recover treble antitrust damages resulting from defendant’s allegedly fraudulent enforcement of the patents held valid. In its original action, 72 C 102, plaintiff Eutectic Corporation (“Eutectic”) sought a declaratory judgment that defendant’s (“Metco”) patents, which disclose a novel flame spraying powder and process, were invalid and not infringed by Eutectic’s flame spray materials.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- H. K. Porter Company, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- George R. Whitten, Jr., Inc., D/B/A Whitten Corporation v. Paddock Pool Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Eutectic Corporation, New Metals Corporation, and Metallizing Company of America, Inc. v. Metco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Security Fire Door Company, a Corporation v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Eutectic Corporation, New Metals Corporation and Metallizing Company of America, Inc., and Cross-Appellants v. Metco, Inc., and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Richard Hoffman Corp. v. Integrated Building Systems Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984