Legal Opinion

Jimeson v. Lehley

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action to obtain the revocation of letters of administration granted by the Surrogate’s Court of the Seneca Nation of Indians.

1Opinion of the CourtWoodward, J.

Matilda Jimeson, a ¡New York Indian, died intestate on the 20th day of December, 1904. It is claimed that she was married to the plaintiff in the year 1890; and it is not disputed that she was the mother of two children, Oscar and Ruth, both of them under age, who have lived with the plaintiff during at least one year prior to the commencement of this action. Matilda Jimeson, as a member of the Seneca Ration of Indians, would, if living, have been entitled to a proportionate share of an award made by the Federal courts under the treaty of Buffalo Creek of 1838, and the plaintiff’s theory…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. States v. Seneca Nation of New York IndiansDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1921
  2. People ex rel. Jimeson v. ShongoNew York Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API