Legal Opinion

United States v. Rahim

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided April 19, 2019No. CRIMINAL NO. 3:17-CR-0169-BPublished

1Opinion of the Court

JANE J. BOYLE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Suppress Statements Made to Law Enforcement Agents on March 5 and 6, 2017 (Doc. 79). For the following reasons, the Court DENIES the motion.

*564I.

BACKGROUND

At issue in this motion to suppress are two interviews that Federal Bureau of Investigation agents conducted of Defendant Said Azzam Mohamad Rahim. This case stems from the FBI's investigation of the mobile application "Zello." Doc. 80, Br. Mot. to Suppress, 1. The FBI began surveilling communications on Zello in the spring of 2016, after suspicions that the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API