Legal Opinion

United States v. Pieragowski

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided June 26, 1970No. 22,941PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

2Per curiam

Specification 2 of the charge alleges that the accused violated Title 21, § 176 (a) of the United States Code, by smuggling marihuana into the United States. In United States v Beeker, 18 USCMA 563, 565, 40 CMR 275 (1969), we held that in the absence of circumstances “to relate . . . [the offense] spe-dally to the military,” the act was not triable by court-martial.

The United States Navy Court of Military Review was of the opinion that this case was distinguishable from Beeker in that the accused arrived in the United States at a military installation by aircraft chartered…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. BeekerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  3. United States v. LeBlancUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. MorleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  2. United States v. BlackUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. Schroth v. WarnerDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1973
  4. United States v. BurstonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976
  5. United States v. WillsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API