Legal Opinion

Stone v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1931No. 8 Div. 404PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The contention is made that the verdict of the jury was the result of a quotient, and therefore will not support the judgment. Whenever it is legally made to appear that the verdict of a jury is the result of a quotient, i. e., an agreement in advance of a vote that the verdict shall be the result or quotient of a division by twelve of the sum total of all the jurors’ 'separate assessments, either of amounts in dollars or terms of imprisonment, such verdict will be set aside on timely motion. Ledbetter v. State, 17 Ala. App. 417, 85 So. 581; Tisdale v. State, 22 Ala. App. 305, 115 So. 146.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  2. Ledbetter v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Tisdale v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roberts v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Storie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  3. Morris v. MorrisCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API