Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Wanless v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1941No. 26364. Order affirmedPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farthing

May 13, 1940, appellee filed her petition for mandamus to compel the city of Chicago to pay a judgment against it. That judgment, entered November 17, 1939, nunc pro tunc as of November 3, 1939, was in the amount of $43,414.58, and costs, and was for damages to appellee’s real estate within the contemplation of section 13 of article 2 of our constitution. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1939, p. 43.) The petition alleged that the city of Chicago had collected and had on hand sufficient moneys to pay said judgment. It charged that section 7-29 of the Municipal Code of Chicago, which would require all…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Healy v. Clean Street Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Feldman v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Moore v. Gar Creek Drainage DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  4. People Ex Rel. Euziere v. RiceIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  5. People Ex Rel. John v. Farwell Co v. KellyIllinois Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sale v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. People Ex Rel. Haynes v. RosenstoneIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  3. People Ex Rel. L. O. Alexander v. City of Mt. VernonIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Department of Public Welfare v. Town of BillericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  5. Department of Public Works & Buildings v. GorbeIllinois Supreme Court · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API