Haslet v. Pan-American Refining Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THREADGILL, C.
This is an appeal by petition in error and case-made from Tulsa county, Okla. It appears from the record that judgment was rendered in the district court on November 10, 1010; that an extension of time wias given the plaintiffs in which to prepare and serve case-made; that case-made was served on defendant on the 0th day of December, 1010; that notice of settling ease-made on the 7th day of March, 1020, was served on defendant on the 1st day of March, 1020; that case-made was settled.and signed by district judge on the 26th day of March, 1020, and filed in the Supreme…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hudson v. DaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- First Nat. Bank of Collinsville v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Ft. Smith & W. R. v. State Nat. Bank of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- In Re Combs' EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Callander v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Bray Clothing Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923