Legal Opinion
Bloch v. Budish
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 16, 1932PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.
This is an appeal from a final decree allowing a mortgagee to reach and apply in satisfaction of a balance due on a mortgage debt the mortgagor’s right to require the grantee of the property, who purchased it from the mortgagor subject to the mortgage, to carry out his agreement to assume and pay the mortgage debt. The bill was filed October 21, 1930.
The prayers asked that the indebtedness of the plaintiff against Louis Budish and the executors of the grantee arising from the deficiency in the foreclosure of the mortgage be established; that the plaintiff be given any rights Budish may have…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Keller v. AshfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Forbes v. ThorpeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- H. G. Kilbourne Co. v. Standard Stamp Affixer Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Pettibone v. Toledo, Cincinnati, & St. Louis RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Rice v. SandersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Franklin v. North Weymouth Cooperative BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- McCarthy v. RogersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Blumenthal v. BlumenthalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Silverstein v. SasterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Conway Savings Bank v. VinickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.