State v. Reynolds
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GRIMM, Judge.
Defendant appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss charges for *325lack of jurisdiction. His motion alleged failure to comply with the Agreement on Detainers, § 217.490, RSMo.1 He contends the federal authorities who had custody of him failed to promptly notify him of Missouri’s detainer. In addition, he claims violation of his constitutional right to a speedy trial. We affirm.
I. Background
Defendant was apparently charged with six counts of first degree robbery and six counts of armed criminal action.2 The State alleged these offenses occurred in May, August,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Kemp v. HodgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. WaltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- State v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993