Legal Opinion

Kirkham v. Harris

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 8, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Edwards

delivered the opinion of the court.

In 1932 appellant instituted an action to foreclose a mortgage securing a note for $2,500, executed by appellee Alice E. Kirkham and others; said appellee entered her written appearance in the cause, was ruled to answer, and called and defaulted for failure to comply with the rule. A decree pro confesso was entered, which, among other matters, recited: “The court further finds from the .evidence that the said promissory note and mortgage deed have been duly assigned and transferred to the complainant, B. A. Harris, for a valuable…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ralls County Court v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Gunzberg v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Schwan v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  4. Hamilton v. QuimbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Walden National Bank v. BirchNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Palma v. PowersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
  2. Epstein v. Chatham Park, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1959
  3. Menconi v. DavisonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API