Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Fox

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1949No. 754PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Plaintiff purchased from defendant a motor scooter, paying therefor $336.35. Approximately three weeks after its purchase the scooter was stolen from in front of plaintiff’s home and has never been recovered. Thereafter plaintiff, through his mother as next friend, brought this action .to recover the purchase price on the ground that at the time of the purchase and at the time suit was filed he was an infant. He obtained judgment for the full purchase price, and defendant has appealed.

Plaintiff was a little over nineteen years of age when he purchased the scooter. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Myers v. Hurley Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. MacGreal v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Schoenung v. GalletWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Wickham v. TorleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  5. Rice Auto Co. v. SpillmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Germaine v. CramerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Keser v. ChagnonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API